Does Supreme Court ruling pose a threat to our children?

Local police and human services workers say decision will interfere with their efforts to investigate sex crimes against juveniles
March 04, 2011
By Sanne Specht
Mail Tribune

http://www.mailtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20110304/NEWS/103040328/-1/NEWS02

I left a really nice comment there-

RE: "We've worked so hard for 25 years to develop a system that works in favor of the victim," Mish said. "They're starting to hack away at it."

As the founder of Oregon Family Rights, I very happily acknowledge being part of the "They're" in that quote.

The "system" they have "developed" is totally outside of the boundaries of Constitutional Due Process. The Greene v. Camreta decision in the Ninth Circuit foremost acknowledges that kids DO have Constitutional Rights.

The "system" is based entirely on the tenets of European Socialism, and that's what the awful UN Convention on the Rights of the Child is about.

See my editorial- Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right"-
http://familyrights.us/news/archive/2009/oct/best_interest.html

The upshot is, do America's children have their Fourth Amendment Right "to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

Or do they need the AWFUL "protection" from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which basically says the government decides what's "In the Best Interest of the Child".

We are NOT defending people sexually molesting kids. We are merely AGHAST at the system of NO DUE PROCESS that has been developed. The accusation is the evidence, fabricated evidence by CPS is fine, perjury by CPS is fine, excluding exculpatory evidence is fine, while innocent parents are faced with up to $100,000 legal fees in defense. Few people can afford it, and they are run though the system to be digested like corn meal.

BY THE WAY, hardly worth mentioning- Eighty-Five percent (85%) of ALL allegations are unfounded. Of the remaining 15%, probably at least half of those people did NOTHING either. But with no Due Process or Vigorous Defense, the system mows them down and grinds them up.

There is a HUGE problem here, and the system would rather keep the population sedated about how bad it really is. That's why Oregon would dearly love to undo the decision of the Ninth Circuit (and Fourth Amendment Rights for KIDS).