Wednesday, August 17, 2011

CHAPTER 45 PERJURY IS NOT ENFORCED IN CIVIL COURT

Posted on October 28, 2009 by admin

PERJURY IS NOT ENFORCED IN OUR CIVIL COURTS TO INCLUDE THE FEDERAL CIVIL COURTS. YOU CAN LIE IN COURT AND NOTHING WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE THE JUDGE CAN’T RULE ON AN ISSUE THAT IS A FELONY. LAWYERS AND JUDGES KNOW PERJURY CANNOT BE ENFORCED IN CIVIL COURTS BUT THEY DON’T WANT YOU THE PUBLIC TO KNOW. THAT’S WHY JUDGES STILL ASK A WITNESS TO “SWEAR TO TELL THE TRUTH” WHEN IT DOESN’T MATTER.

The following letter by Chief Justice Stuart with copies to Judge Macrum and Judge Fasing explains why a judge in any civil court can’t rule on Perjury. After you have downloaded a copy of Judge Stuart’s letter you have to understand there is no record of any District Attorney prosecuting anyone for Perjury in a Civil court in the State of Colorado. (NOR OTHER STATES)

James W. Burneson has sued the Arapahoe District Attorney for failure to prosecute a case which had proof in three separate court cases that perjury was proven in the court’s transcripts. The District Attorney refused to prosecute and claimed he alone has he right to decide who he sues which is the law. Thus Perjury is not enforced in our Civil and Federal Courts.

Why then does our judges continue to ask witnesses in court proceeding to raise their right hand and swear to tell the truth? This is the dirty little secret of our Justice system which Supreme Court Chief Justice Mullarkey continues to deny is the truth.

Ask your local District Attorney when he last prosecuted a case of perjury in a civil court? You will never get an answer because he/she never has sued for perjury in a civil lawsuit. He never will sue as all DAs have done across the country. The DA fear this enforcement would open the Pandora’s box and cause the loss of lawyers legal fees by requiring truth to be allowed in court.

If perjury was enforced in our civil courts half the lawsuits would be dropped. THIS WOULD BE THE GREATEST REVISION OF OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM WITHOUT CHANGING ALL THE STATE LAWS. THIS WOULD ALSO MEAN THAT HALF THE LITIGATING LAWYERS WOULD GO BANKRUPT. ASK YOUR LAWYER WHY PERJURY IS NOT ENFORCED IN OUR COURTS? IF YOU ARE A LAW STUDENT ASK YOU LAW PROFESSOR WHY PERJURY IS NOT ENFORCED IN OUR CIVIL COURTS. THIS DIRTY SECRET ALSO MEANS ALL PRO SE LAWSUITS ARE MISTRIALS IF NO ONE TOLD THE PRO SE HE/SHE AND THEIR WITNESSES COULD LIE LIKE THE LAWYER OPPOSING HIM/HER COULD AND PROBABLY DID. EVERY JUDGE IN EVERY COURT KNOWS WHAT A SHAM THEY ARE RUNNING IN THEIR JOBS.

The Justice Industry and Trial Lawyers have to be allowed to suborn witnesses in trials so they can make a living suing the public. So long as this dirty secret exists we are not a Nation of Laws. The public does not have any court that dispenses justice. We the public are the sheep who are feed upon as a right of lawyers and judges for their income. EVERY LAWYER KNOWS THIS SECRET EXCEPT THE SHEEP. How do you like being a sheep with no rights to protect you against the rights of lawyers to receive income while you are seeking justice in our courts? Think about it truth is not allowed in our civil trials. Witnesses in medical lawsuits are allowed to lie (Perjury) for either side of the case whose pays the most. That’s because perjury is allowed in civil trials. Judge Stuart’s letter one page explains this truth below. Download a copy and send it to friends who need to know what happens when you go to court in the USA.

DOWNLOAD CHIEF JUDGE STUART’S LETTER

http://www.court-house.com/?p=11

No comments:

Post a Comment