Senator Gillibrand Introduces Every Child Deserves a Family Act
YaMinco | November 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM
Yesterday, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) introduced the Every Child Deserves a Family Act (S. 1770), which would prohibit any entity that receives federal assistance and is involved in adoption or foster care placements from discriminating against prospective adoptive or foster parents solely on the basis of their sexual orientation, gender identity, or marital status. One major goal of the legislation is to increase the number of foster and adoptive placements available to children in the foster care system. Currently there are an estimated 400,000 children in the U.S. foster care system, and more than 107,000 children currently waiting to be adopted, but Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) couples or individuals who want to adopt or become foster parents still face discrimination in more than 30 states.
In announcing the introduction of the Every Child Deserves a Family Act, Gillibrand stated, “By removing all barriers for LGBT families to serve as foster parents, New York State has increased its foster parent pool by 128,000 prospective parents. This legislation would open thousands of new foster and adoptive homes to children ensuring they are raised in loving families.” The house companion bill, H.R. 1681, was introduced by Representative Pete Stark (D-CA), back in May.
November is recognized as National Adoption Month, a time to raise awareness about the adoption of children and youth from foster care. To date, Representative Michelle Bachmann (R-MN) and Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) have introduced bicameral resolutions supporting the goals and ideals of National Adoption Day (November 19) and National Adoption Month.
I emphatically vote NO on these things.
S. 1770-
H.R. 1681-
I left this comment there-
American Family Rights Association (http://familyrights.us) strongly OPPOSES this Orwellian-named bill. The family every child deserves is their OWN biological family or kin.
The law about Kinship placement [42 U.S.C. § 671(a)19)] has been absolutely gutted from it's original content to the point now that merely suggests CPS "consider" Kinship placement. There's no money in Kinship placement for CPS, so guess what CPS' first choice is?
With CPS wrongly removing so many kids from their homes (in violation of the children's Fourth Amendment Right), placing children in residences with homosexuals is now viewed as necessary?
No comments:
Post a Comment