The Government Accountability Office (GAO) submitted
testimony
to the House Subcommittee on Human Resources, Committee on Ways and
Means yesterday that explores state Maintenance of Effort (MOE)
requirements for the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
program. The testimony describes the federal and state partnership under
the TANF block grant, including details on required state funding
levels and program measures to ensure full federal financial
contribution. Furthermore, it asserts that appropriate design,
implementation, and monitoring are necessary to ensure a successful
balance between state flexibility and the fulfillment of national
objectives. In all, the testimony provides a description of the TANF MOE
provisions, as opposed to guidance or recommendations in this regard.
TANF
is the main federal program assisting low-income families. It was
created from 1996 welfare reform when the Aid to Dependent Children and
Families (AFDC) entitlement was converted to a block grant. Its
four-part stated purpose is to (1) help needy families care for children
in their home or kinship homes, (2) promote financial independence for
parents, (3) prevent pregnancy outside of marriage, and (4) encourage
two-parent families. TANF provides ongoing cash assistance to about 1.9
million families, including 800,000 kinship families, in addition to
assisting others with a range of services like child welfare, emergency
assistance, child care, and other work supports for families in need.
The
MOE is a required level of state spending on particular activities that
further TANF’s federal purpose. The required amount is generally based
on what the state spent in 1994 on AFDC, the Job Opportunities and Basic
Skills Training Program (JOBS), Emergency Assistance (EA), and
AFDC-related child care. TANF program requirements relate to recipient
eligibility and services provision set by the state, but that fulfills
its four-part federal purpose. In addition to a 60-month family
assistance time-limit, the main federal measure to track adherence to
that purpose is the work participation rate. The expectation is that at
least 50% of families receiving cash assistance participate in at least
one allowable work activity for a sufficient amount of time.
The
testimony looks back to previous GAO studies on TANF to present key
features and trends of TANF MOE expenditures, in addition to reviewing
federal statute; regulations; guidance; and state data and financial
reports, and interviewing U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) and selected state officials. Analysis of these sources indicate
that MOE spending has increased due to states accessing contingency
funds, accessing emergency funds created by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA) stimulus legislation, temporarily broadening
services under the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, and offsetting low
work participation rates. To the last point, reviewed in detail in the
testimony, states can earn credits that allow a workforce participation
rate below 50% if they reduce overall caseloads or contribute more to
the MOE. The testimony concluded that the resulting growth in MOE
spending has created new complexities that call for ensuring MOE
effectiveness.
No comments:
Post a Comment