Need to get the written opinion from the Court.
About time the legal extortion racket has been stopped in its tracks.
By FathersForJustice
Minnesota State Supreme Court Rules on Child Support
The Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision on Wednesday, February 12, 2014 that Child Support is in fact not about one parent giving another parent money through a third party State agency.
The State of Minnesota arrested 64 year old Larry Nelson of Rochester, Minnesota 3 years ago on felony charges of failing to, "care and support" for his 2 children who are now adults. The State of Minnesota claimed that Mr. Nelson had not paid some $83,470.00 of what they considered to be 11 years of so-called "child support." However, in a 4-3 decision it was ruled that the state had not proven their case and that Mr. Nelson had in fact "cared and supported" his children. Many of those following the case agree, the state had not proven it's case and the word "support" does not necessarily correlate with a financial obligation. Olmstead County prosecuting attorney Mark Ostrem concurred, "The term "care and support" are too ambiguous and could create issues for other prosecuting attorneys in Minnesota"
http://www.fathers4justice.org/content/supreme-court-agrees-fathers4justice-rules-child-support-not-about-money
FathersForJustice is based in Sacramento, California, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
About time the legal extortion racket has been stopped in its tracks.
Supreme Court Agrees with Fathers4Justice Rules Child Support is NOT about Money
Sacramento : CA : USA | Feb 13, 2014 at 7:34 PM PSTBy FathersForJustice
Minnesota State Supreme Court Rules on Child Support
The Minnesota State Supreme Court ruled in a 4-3 decision on Wednesday, February 12, 2014 that Child Support is in fact not about one parent giving another parent money through a third party State agency.
The State of Minnesota arrested 64 year old Larry Nelson of Rochester, Minnesota 3 years ago on felony charges of failing to, "care and support" for his 2 children who are now adults. The State of Minnesota claimed that Mr. Nelson had not paid some $83,470.00 of what they considered to be 11 years of so-called "child support." However, in a 4-3 decision it was ruled that the state had not proven their case and that Mr. Nelson had in fact "cared and supported" his children. Many of those following the case agree, the state had not proven it's case and the word "support" does not necessarily correlate with a financial obligation. Olmstead County prosecuting attorney Mark Ostrem concurred, "The term "care and support" are too ambiguous and could create issues for other prosecuting attorneys in Minnesota"
http://www.fathers4justice.org/content/supreme-court-agrees-fathers4justice-rules-child-support-not-about-money
FathersForJustice is based in Sacramento, California, United States of America, and is a Stringer for Allvoices.
No comments:
Post a Comment