The Plot to Destroy the Constitution

Founders Quotes

"I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy. My sons ought to study mathematics and philosophy, geography, natural history and naval architecture, navigation, commerce and agriculture, in order to give their children a right to study painting, poetry, music, architecture, statuary, tapestry, and porcelain." --John Adams, letter to Abigail Adams, 1780

Whose great grand children were raised under the propaganda of Baby and Child Care by Dr Benjamin Spock, who became dope-smoking Hippies, tuned in, turned on, dropped out, became Communists and took over the Democrat Party.

MLK Memorial Made in China

Childhood Under Siege: How Big Business Targets Children

Subject:     Childhood Under Siege: How Big Business Targets Children
Date:     Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:19:31 -0400
From:     veracare <veracare@ahrp.org>
To:     Infomail1@ahrp. org <Infomail1@ahrp.org>

 Alliance for Human Research Protection
A Catalyst for Debate
www.ahrp.org

FYI

An Op Ed in The New York Times by Joel Bakan, a law professor at the University of British Columbia, is the author of "Childhood Under Siege: How Big Business Targets Children", provides insight into the conflict between laws enacted to protect children's best interest and the newly emerging laws that protect corporate best interests. 

This conflict of interest has resulted in devastating consequences: children's best interest, their health and welfare have been sacrificed by for corporate profits.

Bakan cites childhood obesity resulting from irresponsible advertising by the purveyors of junk food. And  the proliferation of toxic chemicals in children's environment that have undermined their health. And he cites under-regulated pharmaceutical industry practices, noting that corporate deception led to widespread prescribing of psychotropic drugs for children:

     "we medicate increasing numbers of children with potentially harmful psychotropic drugs, a trend fueled in part by questionable and under-regulated pharmaceutical industry practices.

     In the early 2000s, for example, drug companies withheld data suggesting that such drugs were more dangerous and less effective for children and teenagers than parents had been led to believe.

     The law now requires "black box" warnings on those drugs' labels, but regulators have done little more to protect children from sometimes unneeded and dangerous drug treatments."

While the statement is true, readers are not informed about the actual scope and magnitude of the deceptive practices by pharmaceutical companies and their professional healthcare "partners" in government and academia that are undermining  children's health and welfare.

Read Corrupt Practices section on the AHRP website. For example, Confidential Expert Witness Report Documents Psychiatrists' Corrupt
Practices at: http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/822/70/

Read more... http://www.ahrp.org/cms/content/view/832/9/

Contact: Vera Hassner Sharav
veracare@ahrp.org
212-595-8974

Obama’s View of Debt

Greed, Corruption and Abuse by Child Protective Services

By Yvonne Mason

Stolen for Profit

There is a crime that is being committed every day under the guise of "best interest of the child." This crime is being committed by Child Protective Services using Adoption and Safe Families Act and Title IV Funding as their yardstick. FULL STORY

I submitted a comment there (subject to moderation)-

It would be my greatest dream for this story to be read by every person in this country who cares about (1)children, (2)rights, (3)fraud and corruption, (4)where Billion$ are going down a rathole.

If you want to see more, or learn How to prepare yourself and your family for "the visit" from CPS, or How to Fight CPS- We have LOTS more info at AFRA.

“There is no system ever devised by mankind that is guaranteed to rip husband and wife or father, mother and child apart so bitterly than our present Family Court System.” -Judge Brian Lindsay, Retired Supreme Court Judge New York, New York

Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©

365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy

Human Events

No.  236 of 365

Tell a liberal how much you appreciate that the Obama economy is a system of checks and balances. He writes the checks, you pay the balance.

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=365+Ways+to+Drive+a+Liberal+Crazy

http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/365-ways-to-drive-a-liberal-crazy

http://www.borders.com/online/store/TitleDetail?sku=1596986425

The CPS "Service Plan"- Your Adhesion Contract with SEIU

AFRA EDITORIALS By Leonard Henderson

August 24, 2011

The CPS "Service Plan"-
Your Adhesion Contract with SEIU

Just your usual Wednesday morning Facebook conversation at AFRA-

CW- We went into negotiate the service plan*(see note) 2 hours later we left with nothing removed from it (now there's accusation of drug abuse, apparently we were cooking meth in the home now too according to them its why the house caught on fire, we need to sign up for welfare even though we wouldn't qualify and HAVE to use their service providers and offer full releases to ours) no changes made or offered come back next week we will talk. The next day we got a call the service plan is not negotiable, visitation is not either. By the way we have canceled the next meeting to negotiate on this service plan. Oh yeah we are separating your kids. The babies can stay in the house where your eldest was bit by one of their 7 dogs the first day they were there! Feels like retribution to me for not signing the plan .... the social worker candidly told my lawyer they don't have the resources for the visits, but they have them to keep 3 or 4 workers in a service plan meeting for hours- unbelievable. Saving MyDaughter <<<HAVE to use their service provider>>> THEIR service provider will say whatever CPS wants them to say. Just in case you end up in front of an honest judge they wont look like blatant liars. Get your own service provider. There is not much you can do about their lying but you certainly don't have to help them make their lies look plausible. Sorry to hear your involved with those psychotic monsters. A lawyer that is not in their pocket usually helps a lot. It does not seem like your lawyer is doing anything. Leonard Henderson @CW- This story sounds ever so much like a union "negotiating" with an employer- using the typical belligerence and threats. OH.....WAIT.....A.....MINUTE..... CPS people ARE UNION PEOPLE aren't they? In fact, they likely are SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION (SEIU). A union that has gained world-wide fame for how crooked, evil, corrupt, and COMMUNIST it is. I have one of their manuals on methods of doing a nasty STRIKE. Leonard Henderson- Found the SEIU manual- http://www.scribd.com/doc/60893001/SEIU-Contract-Campaign-Manual-Pressuring-the-Employer Leonard Henderson- Guess what it is titled? CONTRACT CAMPAIGN MANUAL Leonard Henderson- This is an entirely new thought and angle. Call your lawyers RIGHT NOW. Give them the link to the SEIU manual. Negotiating a CONTRACT with SEIU members? This is not Tiddlywinks.

New Facebook Thread-

Leonard Henderson-  The SEIU Training Manual on SCRIBD What I found was a photo-copied Exhibit attached to Case 1:11-cv-00276-CMH -IDD. I went looking for the case by the number 1:11-cv-00276 http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=AmYloBbZGDOAOWQVSjvA48ibvZx4?p=1%3A11-cv-00276 Leonard Henderson-Very, VERY interesting reading- http://mrsmiththinks.blogspot.com/2011/07/thuggary-101-just-ask-seiu.html MR. SMITH THINKS: THUGGERY 101 - JUST ASK SEIU MONDAY, JULY 18, 2011 "There is a federal law suit going on called Sodexo, Inc. v. SEIU where an employer got mad at union tactics, and filed its own suit. It is in Federal Court in the Eastern District of Virginia, case No 1:11-cv-00276-CMH-IDD. It is a RICO case, alleging that the SEIU tactics are an ongoing criminal enterprise from which Sodexo, having been damaged is entitled to reparations from the union. In discovery (examining evidentiary documents) a 70 page book called "CONTRACT CAMPAIGN MANUAL" was unearthed by Sodexo. That book might as well be named "Thuggery for Unions", as it describes tactics which have nothing to do with across the table contract negotiations to pressure employers into cooperation and acceptance of contracts which benefit the union, even if they are unreasonable." Leonard Henderson- These are the SAME PEOPLE, using the SAME METHODS to terrify and force regular people in the talons of CPS (under the wing of being a government employee) to sign a nasty ADHESION CONTRACT, which means a contract all to the advantage of CPS and no actual responsibilities to CPS.

*^Note
You are supposed to help develop the "Service Plan

---

WHAT IS AN ADHESION CONTRACT?

A type of contract, a legally binding agreement between two parties to do a certain thing, in which one side has all the bargaining power and uses it to write the contract primarily to his or her advantage.

An example of an adhesion contract is a standardized contract form that offers goods or services to consumers on essentially a "take it or leave it" basis without giving consumers realistic opportunities to negotiate terms that would benefit their interests. When this occurs, the consumer cannot obtain the desired product or service unless he or she acquiesces to the form contract.

There is nothing unenforceable or even wrong about adhesion contracts. In fact, most businesses would never conclude their volume of transactions if it were necessary to negotiate all the terms of every Consumer Credit contract. Insurance contracts and residential leases are other kinds of adhesion contracts. This does not mean, however, that all adhesion contracts are valid. Many adhesion contracts are Unconscionable; they are so unfair to the weaker party that a court will refuse to enforce them. 

An example would be severe penalty provisions for failure to pay loan installments promptly that are physically hidden by small print located in the middle of an obscure paragraph of a lengthy loan agreement. In such a case a court can find that there is no meeting of the minds of the parties to the contract and that the weaker party has not accepted the terms of the contract.

West's Encyclopedia of American Law, edition 2. Copyright 2008 The Gale Group, Inc. All rights reserved.

---

adhesion contract (contract of adhesion) n. a contract (often a signed form) so imbalanced in favor of one party over the other that there is a strong implication it was not freely bargained. Example: a rich landlord dealing with a poor tenant who has no choice and must accept all terms of a lease, no matter how restrictive or burdensome, since the tenant cannot afford to move. An adhesion contract can give the little guy the opportunity to claim in court that the contract with the big shot is invalid. This doctrine should be used and applied more often, but the same big guy-little guy inequity may apply in the ability to afford a trial or find and pay a resourceful lawyer. (See: contract)

Copyright © 1981-2005 by Gerald N. Hill and Kathleen T. Hill. All Right reserved.

---

LOTS MORE ABOUT THE DAMNED "Service Plan" at AFRA How to Fight CPS-

The Service Plan - IT'S A TRAP!

---

Now how many people are MADDER THAN HELL AND AIN'T GONNA TAKE IT ANYMORE?

I would guess a whole bunch of lawyers need to jump on this like flies on a pile of shit.

---

COMMENTS

---

New DCF "mini Miranda" for Connecticut

Ellington lawyer wins battle for DCF ‘mini-Miranda’ law
By Alex Wood
Journal Inquirer
Published: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 12:36 PM EDT

Starting in October, social workers investigating possible child abuse or neglect for the state Department of Children and Families will have to give parents a written notice of their rights, roughly comparable to the famous Miranda warnings that police give to crime suspects.

“Even sophisticated people believe they must speak to DCF,” said Ellington lawyer Michael H. Agranoff, whose office drafted the new law and advocated it for a decade.

Agranoff, who specializes in representing adults in DCF-related cases, calls the new law the “DCF mini-Miranda” and “the Magna Carta of parents’ rights in Connecticut.”

You must be a subscriber to view the rest of the story.

THIS IS MAJOR, MAJOR NEWS

As soon as we can find more details about this law, it needs to be promoted in every state of the US.

Looking for more info, I did find THIS- and it's GOOD INFO-

Typical DCF Tricks
By Atty. Michael H. Agranoff

Here's his EXCELLENT website-

The Law Offices of Michael H. Agranoff

UPDATE-

Here is the bill in original PDF format which I have converted into HTML format so you can copy and paste it into documents.

Raised Bill No. 5143
An Act Concerning Investigations By The Department Of Children And Families


PDF FORMAT        HTML FORMAT

Gain Constitutional Literacy, Preserve Parental Rights

Sign the Petition

Donate

Volunteer

Learn More

View Online

August 23, 2011 Preview the First Episode Thirsty? Get 2 PRO sports bottles with your new $5 or more monthly donation. Share This Online Preserve Parental Rights Join the Summer of 76 Campaign

Gain Constitutional Literacy, Preserve Parental Rights Here’s a way you can gain in-depth knowledge of the Constitution and help advance parental rights. Have you ever wished that you had a better understanding of the Constitution of the United States? Have you ever wished that your elected officials and judges had a better understanding of the Constitution of the United States? Whenever I give detailed explanations of the constitutional issues surrounding parental rights, I find myself teaching about federalism, the proper role of the judiciary, the powers of Congress, and the history of fundamental rights. It is always easier to explain the parental rights issue to people who have a good understanding of our overall constitutional system. Unfortunately, very few elected officials have an in-depth understanding of the Constitution. Many judges and most lawyers also are woefully ignorant of the original meaning of the Constitution. One of the founding fathers said that people who are “enlightened” about the Constitution and the current actions of government would never allow our government to become tyrannical. When the people don’t really know the Constitution well, officials run rampant over our liberties. I am convinced that the only way we are going to recover our freedoms is if We The People become constitutionally literate and then hold our officials accountable. After all they take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. It is not enough to read the Constitution. We need to know what it really means. We need to know what the people who wrote and ratified the Constitution meant by the words they used. And we need to know what the Supreme Court has done. The Supreme Court’s decisions need to be compared to the original meaning of the Constitution so we can understand whether the Court is protecting or undermining our liberties. After teaching constitutional law for nearly 20 years to high school students, and for over 10 years to college students, I have decided to create a course in Constitutional Literacy that everyone can watch. Constitutional Literacy is a 25-lesson course on DVD. All you have to do is put it in your DVD player and watch. No assignments. No tests. You will learn about: The powers of Congress The powers of the President The proper role of the judiciary The real meaning of the Commerce Clause (which is used in all federal regulatory programs to control our lives) The true meaning of the General Welfare Clause (which is used to spend trillions of dollars) Religious freedom Freedom of speech, press, and association Equal protection The Second Amendment International Law And more And, of course, there is a session on the constitutional rights of parents. Each lesson is a 20-minute-long, fast-moving enriched media production that is far more than plain lecture. We even have actual oral arguments in the Supreme Court of the United States which I guarantee that you will find fascinating. There are a total of 25 lessons. Click here to see the video trailer for the series so that you can get the feel for the series. And click here to see the entire first lesson for free. This series is so new that it is being sent to the duplicator this week. It will be ready to be shipped by mid-September. The series is going to retail for $95 plus tax and shipping. But we have a special offer just for the supporters of Parentalrights.org. If you donate $75 or more to Parentalrights.org before September 17th (which is Constitution Day), we will send you the entire 25 episode series. All shipping charges are included. If you donate $100, we will not only send you this entire series, we will also hand deliver a copy of this series on the Constitution to the office of your congressman or one of your senators*. If you donate $200, you will get the series and we will deliver a copy of Constitutional Literacy to the office of your Congressman and both of your U.S. Senators**. I guarantee you that they need to become constitutionally literate. This will help advance parental rights in a number of ways. • Your donation will help fund the activities of Parentalrights.org • Your own knowledge of the Constitution will help you as you advocate for parental rights • You can help ensure that your Congressman and Senators have the opportunity (for the first time in their lives for most of them) to truly become constitutionally literate. ParentalRights.org genuinely needs your support. But if you give right now, before September 17th, you can not only help ParentalRights.org, you can also help your family and your nation become constitutionally literate. For the Family, Michael Farris President *If your Congessman has already received one, we will deliver one to your senior senator, then to the junior senator. **If all three of your lawmakers have already received a copy, we will deliver Constitutional Literacy to the next-closest lawmaker to your district.

P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org

State government has gotten 7% smaller

For the first time anyone can recall, state government employment has shrunk for two years in a row, shedding nearly 4,700 full-time jobs since 2009, more than 7 percent of the workforce.
By Andrew Garber
Seattle Times

OLYMPIA — Gerry Ketchum says he can walk you through Department of Social and Health Services offices that look like a ghost town because of jobs cuts.

In some cases, after passing through a busy front lobby, "you walk back and I'm like, 'Where are all the people? What happened to all the people who used to be here?' " said Ketchum, who works at a state DSHS office in Seattle's Belltown neighborhood.

For the first time anyone can recall, state government employment has shrunk for two years in a row due to budget cuts, shedding nearly 4,700 full-time jobs since 2009. That's more than 7 percent of the workforce. FULL STORY

I left a nice comment there-

An ideal situation would be for ALL of the CPS agents to not only lose their employment, but for them to be facing charges for their FEDERAL CRIMES against families, several of which are capital offenses.

http://familyrights.us/bin/CPS_violates_these_every_case.htm

Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©

Judge rightly delayed release of Butts mental health records

BY DARRYL SWAN
The South County Spotlight, Aug 17, 2011
Scappoose, OR

Columbia County Circuit Judge Ted Grove made the right call when he delayed release of accused murderer Daniel A. Butts’ first mental health evaluation to the public, despite the Oregonian newspaper’s push to have those records made public earlier.

Grove said he rescinded his initial order to release the mental health evaluation conducted in April because there was doubt it would provide a complete picture of Butts’ mental state.

For now, the records will stay sealed under a protective order until the 21-year-old Butts returns from the Oregon State Hospital. Butts was transported to the hospital in early July to undergo a comprehensive mental health evaluation in the lead up to a hearing that will determine whether he is fit to aid and assist in his trial.

The results of his mental health evaluation are expected to be released to the public on Sept. 19, little more than a week before the hearing.

In a trial of this stature – one that is certain to capture the attention of regional and even national media – in which the scales of justice for fallen Rainier Police Chief Ralph Painter have yet to tip, we can afford patience.

Though the evaluation could provide some answers to the many questions surrounding Butts’ alleged deadly action against Painter in January, in the end its release to the public satisfies only curiosity for curiosity’s sake and has no bearing on the substance or outcome of the pending trial.

I left a nice comment there (subject to moderation)-

On a similar subject- Isn't it interesting how CPS colludes with the mental illness clinicians to work up a bogus Psych Eval in order to assassinate parent's character, kidnap the kids and make them Legal Orphans?

All done in the unconstitutional courts of NO Due Process by "credentialed professionals" utilizing their "particularized guarantees of trustworthiness" for their (often) second and third-hand HEARSAY.

See The CPS case- What happens in the fog - http://www.examiner.com/family-rights-in-national/the-cps-case-what-happens-the-fog

Leonard Henderson, co-founder

American Family Rights

http://familyrights.us

"Until Every Child Comes Home"©

"The Voice of America's Families"©

Foster Parents; False Allegations. Part 3 of 3

Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner

In part two of this series, we had just made a statement that bears repeating. We, that is Foster Parents Legal Solutions, understand where foster parents… FULL STORY

Founders Quotes

"It should be the highest ambition of every American to extend his views beyond himself, and to bear in mind that his conduct will not only affect himself, his country, and his immediate posterity; but that its influence may be co-extensive with the world, and stamp political happiness or misery on ages yet unborn." --George Washington, letter to the Legislature of Pennsylvania, 1789

Back to School with AFRA

"Parents give up their rights when they drop the children off at public school." 
--Federal District Judge Melinda Harmon

Judge Harmon made that ruling against the parents after the parents sued a Texas school district. Their son had been questioned at school without their knowledge, and strip searched by a female Texas Children's Protective Services worker looking for signs of paddling the boy's parents had allegedly administered. -Wall St. Journal 10/8/96-

FULL ARTICLE- Back to School with AFRA

Psychiatrists seek to destigmatize adult-child sex

Conference concludes better to 'focus on the needs' of pedophile than worry about protecting children
Posted: August 22, 2011 9:39 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh © 2011 WND

While a highly controversial campaign featuring doctors and psychiatrists seeks to normalize sexual activity between adults and children of almost any age, the principal expert investigator for a U.S. Justice Department study on child sex abuse warns that the pedophilia advocates are using the same strategy that was successfully employed to make homosexuality a classroom subject for small children in the nation's public schools.

Dr. Judith Reisman recently attended a symposium held by "minority-attracted people" advocacy group B4U-ACT to disseminate "accurate information" on the position that pedophilia is just one more alternative sexual orientation.

"If a foreign country came in and did this to our nation, the nation would be outraged," Reisman told WND today about the B4U-Act event, also attended by J. Matt Barber, vice president of Liberty Counsel Action.

The speakers promoted the idea that the American Psychiatric Association should remove pedophilia from the list of mental defects in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

Reisman explained the same strategy was used by homosexual activists in the 1970s when same-sex attractions were removed from the APA's list of disorders. Eventually, the legalization of "gay marriage," the mandatory homosexuality lessons in public schools and the brand-new policy of allowing open homosexuality in the U.S. military resulted.

Read more: Psychiatrists seek to destigmatize adult-child sex http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=336869

The Illusion of Safety

Congressman Ron Paul

Recent incidents of violence in Norway and London have made us understandably uncomfortable here at home, as many fear that a worsening economy will lead to violence and unrest in American cities. This is why Congress must view the economy as its first priority and a matter of national security: unless and until we get our fiscal house in order to foster economic growth, civil society will continue to deteriorate.

The fundamental lesson every American should learn from these incidents is that government cannot protect us. No matter how many laws we pass, no matter how many police or federal agents we put on the streets, a determined individual or group can still cause great harm. Both Norway and England have strict gun control laws, and London in particular has security cameras monitoring nearly all public areas. But laws and spy cameras are useless in the face of lawless mobs or sick mass killers. Only private individuals on the scene could have prevented or lessened these tragedies. And we should remember that theft, arson, and property damage were not the only criminal acts in London--innocent bystanders were assaulted and killed as well. In those instances deadly force used in self-defense would have been fully justified.

Perhaps the only good that can come from these terrible events is a reinforced understanding that we as individuals are responsible for our safety and the safety of our families. This means, frankly, that we must safely own and use firearms to deter or prevent criminal assaults on our homes and persons. It is absurd to think police or government agents can protect 310 million Americans around the clock.

Thanks to our media and many government officials, however, Americans have become conditioned to view the state as our protector and the solution to every problem. Whenever something terrible happens, especially when it becomes a prominent news story, people reflexively demand that government do something. This impulse almost always leads to bad laws, more debt, and the loss of liberty. It is completely at odds with the best American traditions of self-reliance and individual responsibility.

Do we really want to live in a world of police checkpoints, surveillance cameras, and metal detectors? Do we want to imprison every disturbed or alienated individual who fantasizes about violence? Do we really believe government can provide total security? Or can we accept that liberty is more important than the illusion of state-provided security?

Freedom is not defined by safety. Freedom is defined by the ability of citizens to live without government interference unless they use force or fraud against others. Government cannot create a world without risks, nor would we really wish to live in such a fictional place. Only a totalitarian society would even claim absolute safety as a worthy ideal, because it would require total state control over its citizens’ lives. Liberty has meaning only if we still believe in it when terrible things happen and a false government security blanket beckons.

http://paul.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1905:the-illusion-of-safety&catid=62:texas-straight-talk&Itemid=69

Liberty Quotes

The Law of Equal Freedom, as Adopted by The Libertarian League

Since life itself contains the impulse of physical growth and the development of faculties and therefore needs room and freedom to function; and since liberty is necessary to the exercise of faculties; and since the exercise of faculties is essential to happiness; therefore, to attain happiness one must have liberty. And since liberty, being essential to the individual, is also necessary to the race; and since this necessitates limiting the liberty of each to the like liberty of all, we therefore arrive at the sociological Law of Equal Freedom.

Libertarian Principles

Freedom of thought is essential to the discovery of truth.
Freedom of speech is essential to the vindication of truth.
Freedom of the press is requisite for the dissemination of knowledge.
Freedom of assembly is essential for the discussion of public questions.
Freedom in education is essential to the development of correct principles of study and teaching.
Freedom in science is essential to the demonstration of fact, through investigation and experimentation.
Freedom in literature, art and music is necessary for the highest expression of conceptions and emotions.
Freedom in amusements and sports is essential to the fullest enjoyment of recreation.
Freedom in religion is necessary to avert persecution (as, e.g., for adopting and professing religious opinions, and for worshiping or not worshiping, according to the dictates of conscience).
Freedom of initiative and association is necessary for efficiency and economic in individual or co-operative enterprise.

-- Charles T. Sprading
Source: Freedom and Its Fundamentals (Los Angeles, Libertarian Publishing Company, 1923, pp. 9-10)
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Charles.Sprading.Quote.64B8

Foster Parents; False Allegations! Part 2 of 3

Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner

In part one of this series we were talking about false allegations and how destructive they can be. The difference may very well be preparation for this… FULL STORY

JurisDictionary- Tips and Tactics

Tips & Tactics

Video   |   Learn More   |   American Justice Foundation

Lawsuit Hope and Hype ...

See the cute little blue fellow?

He's hoping.

Not that hope isn't a good thing.

Hope based on truth is a good thing.

Unrealistic hope is not.

Unprepared hope is not.

Uninformed hope is not.

In other words, hope based on hype is foolishness.

Received favorable responses to our last Tips & Tactics yet some still hold legal mythology is better than learning the official rules and how to use official rules.

I want you to WIN ! ! !

But, you cannot win hoping on hype ... no matter how promising the hype may seem.

Sure, it would be great if you could get out of paying a speeding ticket by claiming you copyrighted your name so the courts can't use your name without your permission, or that your name in ALL CAPITAL LETTERS isn't "you", or that you're a "person" not a "citizen" and therefore above the law and no longer subject to government force.

It would be great to go about doing as you please with no regard to man's law, claiming you're serving God when, by the way, scripture tells us to obey those in authority over us (and, yes, you could insist no one has authority over you).

But, I want you to WIN in court!

You will not win if you refuse to learn the rules and how to use the rules to get justice legally.

You will not win if you show up in court with silver-bullet methods to "get around the law".

Sure, once in awhile someone skips out of a busy traffic court by getting the judge exasperated with internet legal mythology, but I've been to court more than a few times since 1986 when I was first sworn in (and not to any British agency, by the way!) as a member of the Florida Bar. I've seen judges get exasperated and let people off scott-free. I've seen many more escorted by the bailiff to a cell where they were left to decide if they wished to be subject to the official rules.

You choose.

We all have that choice.

It's our prerogative in this wonderful nation.

Go to court with legal mythology sold by those who wish you to believe you are "above the law of the land", or go to court knowing how to use the official rules to get Justice the American Way ... according to law!

In 24 hours with my affordable, official Jurisdictionary "How to Win in Court" step-by-step self-help course you will know how to command judges and stop crooked lawyers in their tracks!

It's not mythology!

It's all based on official rules YOU can use to get justice by demanding everyone follow the rules!

That's what too many American Heros died to give you!

1. Law and Order.
2. Due Process.
3. The Rule of Law.

These are the three things true patriots fight for!

Help Your Friends!

Forward this email so your friends can get the free
Lawsuit Flowchart

www.Jurisdictionary.com

================================

Got questions about lawsuits?

Get FREE answers on our Lawsuit Q&A Forums.


We've put the forums back on our Jurisdictionary web site. The link is on the left of every page. You don't even have to register to read the posts. We have the latest and most secure forum software available.

If you wish to post a question in an existing thread or start a new thread, just click the "register" button at the top-right of the main screen and respond to the confirmation email you receive after you register. A moderator will review your application and approve you a few hours later so you can post. All posts are moderated for your protection.

Once registered, you can ask questions and answer other people's questions.

Jurisdictionary answers questions, too!

Go to Jurisdictionary now and click the link on the left to visit our Free Lawsuit Q&A Forums.

Jurisdictionary will try to answer ALL QUESTIONS you post, so here's an easy and FREE way to get the info you need to start learning what it takes to win.

Copyright © 2009 Jurisdictionary - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED

Jurisdictionary ®
c/o Dr. Frederick D. Graves
621 Howard Creek Lane
Stuart, Florida 34994
USA
Toll Free: 866-LAW-EASY (866-529-3279)