No. 329 of 365
Quote Richard Lamm, former Democratic Governor of Colorado:
"Christmas is a time when kids tell Santa what they want and adults pay for it. Deficits are when adults tell the government what they want and their kids pay for it."
Friday, November 25, 2011
365 Ways to Drive a Liberal Crazy
Human Events
No. 329 of 365
Quote Richard Lamm, former Democratic Governor of Colorado:
"Christmas is a time when kids tell Santa what they want and adults pay for it. Deficits are when adults tell the government what they want and their kids pay for it."
No. 329 of 365
Quote Richard Lamm, former Democratic Governor of Colorado:
"Christmas is a time when kids tell Santa what they want and adults pay for it. Deficits are when adults tell the government what they want and their kids pay for it."
WARNING – Parents in California – Withdraw Your Children from Public School Now!
Written on NOVEMBER 24, 2011 by GIACOMO
WARNING – Parents in California – Withdraw Your Children from Public School Now!
Godfather Politics
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2196/warning-parents-in-california-withdraw-your-kids-from-public-school-now
I left a nice comment there-
The author of this article seems to be blissfully unaware of Childrens "Protective" Services. As far as they are concerned, homeschooling is "educational neglect", for which they will happily kidnap your child(ren), put them on antipsychotic dope, and place them with homosexual fosters.
As an added feature, they will do a character assassination on you (the parent) and run you through the unconstitutional courts of NO Due Process.
It's a LOT worse out here in the proletariat than people realize.
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©
WARNING – Parents in California – Withdraw Your Children from Public School Now!
Godfather Politics
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2196/warning-parents-in-california-withdraw-your-kids-from-public-school-now
I left a nice comment there-
The author of this article seems to be blissfully unaware of Childrens "Protective" Services. As far as they are concerned, homeschooling is "educational neglect", for which they will happily kidnap your child(ren), put them on antipsychotic dope, and place them with homosexual fosters.
As an added feature, they will do a character assassination on you (the parent) and run you through the unconstitutional courts of NO Due Process.
It's a LOT worse out here in the proletariat than people realize.
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©
Foster Parents; P.R.I.D.E. or beyond? Part 2 of 5
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
In part one, we started this series with a definition of what is P.R.I.D.E. what does the acronym stand for. We reiterate that...… FULL STORY
In part one, we started this series with a definition of what is P.R.I.D.E. what does the acronym stand for. We reiterate that...… FULL STORY
The Dr Phil SystemSuckology Special - Falsely Accused Parents being spun off into an hour long CASA Commercial
The Dr Phil SystemSuckology Special - Falsely Accused Parents being spun off into an hour long CASA Commercial
Legally Kidnapped
November 24, 2011
I love you all dearly, but if I see one more person put even the slightest ray of hope or faith into Dr Phil after this, I will personally vomit. He's got his agenda and I'm sure he's paid well to preach the Imperialistic Morality Parade to the stupid who watch him on a regular basis.
Dr Phil, however is a bought and sold system suck who doesn't give a rats ass about you. This episode of his show, which I'm about to show you, pretty much sums it up.
Legally Kidnapped
November 24, 2011
I love you all dearly, but if I see one more person put even the slightest ray of hope or faith into Dr Phil after this, I will personally vomit. He's got his agenda and I'm sure he's paid well to preach the Imperialistic Morality Parade to the stupid who watch him on a regular basis.
Dr Phil, however is a bought and sold system suck who doesn't give a rats ass about you. This episode of his show, which I'm about to show you, pretty much sums it up.
"Especially important is the warning to avoid conversations with the demon. We may ask what is relevant but anything beyond that is dangerous. He is a liar. The demon is a liar. He will lie to confuse us. But he will also mix lies with the truth to attack us. The attack is psychological, Damien, and powerful. So don't listen to him. Remember that - do not listen."~ Father Merrin The Exorcist 1973And with that in mind, I present to you via the miracle of somebody who made it available on YouTube the highly anticipated Dr Phil Parents Falsely Accused show. FULL STORY
Thursday, November 24, 2011
JurisDictionary- Control Corrupt Courts!
Tips & TacticsNovember 24, 2011 © 1997-2011 by Jurisdictionary® - All Rights Reserved
Control Corrupt Courts!
( From our "How to Win" Step-by-Step Self-Help Course )
Click ... or Call Toll Free 866-LAW-EASY (866-529-3279)
Instead of writing a long Tips & Tactics newsletter this week, I thought I'd show you how to control corrupt courts!
You won't believe me, but most lawyers (and nearly all law school professors) don't have a clue what it takes to win in the real world.
That's right!
Law school teaches all sorts of things ... but not how to control judges nor how to overcome scheming tricks of crooked lawyers!
Law school is not the real world. Most professors never practiced law. Moreover, to keep their jobs they must be too politically correct to teach law students how some judges are biased or corrupt and how to overcome the scheming tricks of crooked lawyers.
What law students learn in law school is legal theory and the fundamentals required to pass the Bar Exam ... not much practical knowledge!
Theory doesn't win lawsuits.
You need to win your lawsuit!
You need to know what's important, what's not, and how to focus your energy where it belongs: getting court orders!Most lawyers never learn this.
All the posturing, big words, flamboyant behavior, lapel-thumbing, courtroom strutting accomplishes nothing!
The only thing that matters is the ink flowing from a judge's pen when he signs court orders.
You must know how to control corrupt judges and overcome crooked lawyers. You must be able to re-direct the judge's bias and the lawyers' sneaky tricks!
There's a reason why lawyer jokes proliferate.
There's a reason why so many complain about high-minded, high-handed judges who ignore the law.
Political correctness prevents justice!
Winning lawsuits is a brutal, no-holds-barred, axe fight!
Jurisdictionary is your axe!
| Affordable 24-hour Step-by-Step Self-Help Course Includes: 5-hour video CD simplifies the process of litigation 2 audio CDs present practical tactics and procedures 15 in-depth tutorials on a 4th CD lay out the basics Free EasyGuide to the Rules of Court Instant On-Line Access while CDs are in the Mail Still Only $249 ... plus $7.50 Priority Mail Shipping & Handling Save legal fees! Control judges! Defeat crooked lawyers! www.Jurisdictionary.com Ask anyone who has our course ... "Jurisdictionary Works!" Call Toll Free for details: 866-Law-Easy |
| Copyright © 2011 Jurisdictionary® - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED c/o Dr. Frederick D. Graves, JD 621 Howard Creek Lane Stuart, Florida 34994 Toll Free: 866-Law-Easy ( 866-529-3279 ) |
5-Year-Old Handcuffed, Charged With Battery On Officer
Boy Cuffed With Zip Ties On Hands, Feet
Dave Manoucheri/KCRA
POSTED: 2:59 pm PST November 23, 2011
UPDATED: 7:39 am PST November 24, 2011
http://www.kcra.com/news/29847063/detail.html
The problem with Corporal Punishment controversy solved- Arrest 5 year olds and charge them with a crime. Give him a court appointed attorney to talk him into a Plea Bargain. You just gotta luv Great Big Fat Nanny's solutions.
Dave Manoucheri/KCRA
POSTED: 2:59 pm PST November 23, 2011
UPDATED: 7:39 am PST November 24, 2011
http://www.kcra.com/news/29847063/detail.html
The problem with Corporal Punishment controversy solved- Arrest 5 year olds and charge them with a crime. Give him a court appointed attorney to talk him into a Plea Bargain. You just gotta luv Great Big Fat Nanny's solutions.
The #1 Cause of Accidental Death in the U.S. - Are You at Risk?
Posted By Dr. Mercola | November 24 2011
With all its designer drugs and state-of-the-art machinery, you'd think modern medicine is the perfect fix for providing patient-focused care.
You might also expect that Americans would be the healthiest people on Earth, seeing that the U.S. is the epicenter of all this technology, and especially since we spend more on health care than any other country in the world.
Yet, every year in the U.S., seven out of 10 deaths are due to preventable chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis, stroke, and obesity.
How can that be?
How is it that we're not just chronically ill, but also lagging behind most industrialized nations in life expectancy?
The answer lies in how we approach health care: like it or not, the real focus of modern medicine is on selling disease and making money, not making you well. FULL STORY
FRAUD EVERYWHERE. Now the government owns it. The beast has been Nationalized and Socialized.
With all its designer drugs and state-of-the-art machinery, you'd think modern medicine is the perfect fix for providing patient-focused care.
You might also expect that Americans would be the healthiest people on Earth, seeing that the U.S. is the epicenter of all this technology, and especially since we spend more on health care than any other country in the world.
Yet, every year in the U.S., seven out of 10 deaths are due to preventable chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis, stroke, and obesity.
How can that be?
How is it that we're not just chronically ill, but also lagging behind most industrialized nations in life expectancy?
The answer lies in how we approach health care: like it or not, the real focus of modern medicine is on selling disease and making money, not making you well. FULL STORY
FRAUD EVERYWHERE. Now the government owns it. The beast has been Nationalized and Socialized.
Wednesday, November 23, 2011
New Study Examines Antipsychotic Treatment among Youth in Foster Care
New Study Examines Antipsychotic Treatment among Youth in Foster Care
by YaMinco | November 23, 2011 at 12:34 PM
A new study, Antipsychotic Treatment Among Youth in Foster Care, examined concomitant antipsychotic use among Medicaid-enrolled youth in foster care, compared with disabled or low-income Medicaid-enrolled youth. The study looked at a sample of roughly 17,000 youth who were continuously enrolled in Medicaid program and had at least one psychiatric diagnosis and one antipsychotic prescription. Most of the children in the study were in foster care, some also had a disability, and the others were adopted out of foster care during the study period. For comparison, the researchers also looked at kids on Medicaid who had disabilities or were receiving Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, but were not in foster care.
They found that more than a third of the kids in foster care without disabilities had multiple antipsychotic prescriptions lasting longer than 90 days. The children who were not adopted had the highest rates of prescriptions, representing 38 out of every 100 children in foster care. In comparison, 26 out of every 100 children who were on public assistance but not in foster care had more than one antipsychotic prescription.
The findings suggest that children in foster care are being prescribed antipsychotic drugs just as frequently as some of the most disabled children on Medicaid. The authors recommend that additional studies are needed to assess the clinical rationale, safety, and outcomes of concomitant antipsychotic use and to inform statewide policies for monitoring and oversight of antipsychotic use among youth in the foster care system.
While statistics suggest that up to 80% of all children in foster care have serious emotional problems, approximately half of them have chronic medical problems, and the youngest, those ages 0-5, have developmental delays, experts believe that doctors are this population with the same powerful drugs given to people with schizophrenia and severe bipolar disorder, even though there is no evidence to support this kind of use in young children, and despite the fact that these disorders are rare in young children.
In recent years, doctors and policy makers have grown concerned about high rates of overall psychiatric drug use in the foster care system. Previous studies have found that children in foster care receive psychiatric medications at about twice the rate among children outside the system. In 2008, the House Ways and Means Subcommittee on Income Security and Family Support held a hearing on the utilization of psychotropic medication for children in foster care. In 2010, Senator Daniel Akaka (D-HI) asked the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to investigate the prevalence of prescribed psychotropic medications for children in foster care.
http://childrensmonitor.wordpress.com/2011/11/23/new-study-examines-antipsychotic-treatment-among-youth-in-foster-care/
So what's gonna be done about the obvious, ungodly FRAUD? I have a suggestion-
Senate Committee Announces Hearing On Child Abuse
Senate Committee Announces Hearing On Child Abuse
by YaMinco | November 23, 2011 at 12:31 PM
Prior to the introduction of his Speak Up to Protect Every Abused Kid Act of 2011, Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) wrote to the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Subcommittee on Children and Families requesting a hearing to examine federal statutes designed to force those who witness the sexual abuse of a child to report the crime to authorities. In his letter, Casey explained that the serious nature of the allegations of sexual abuse and the evidence on the public record of failure to report by individuals at Penn State warrant a review of the relationship between federal and state reporting requirements on child abuse and neglect. Furthermore, he asked that the hearing pay special attention to the Child Abuse Prevention a nd Treatment Act, which was recently reauthorized and contains a new provision to strengthen reporting of child abuse and neglect.
This week, Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), the Chairwoman of the Subcommittee, along with Ranking Member Richard Burr (R- N.C.), joined with Casey to announce that the Senate would hold its first hearing in the wake of the Penn State child abuse scandal. As a former social worker, Mikulski said she believes that the hearing will shed light on prevention and deterrence of child sexual abuse. She also thanked Casey for his
The hearing will also examine existing gaps in the system and examine proposals to improve reporting requirements. As previously reported, only 18 states currently require all adults to report suspected child abuse. Mikulski and Burr are working on putting together a balanced and comprehensive hearing which is scheduled for Tuesday, December 13th.
Just more of that knee-Jerk Paranoia the Communists love to foment.
Foster Parents; P.R.I.D.E. Trainings? Part 1 of 5
November 23, 2011
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
By now, you know your Foster Families Examiner, you know the FPLS approach to any topic. Let us begin with a definition of P.R.I.D.E..… FULL STORY
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
By now, you know your Foster Families Examiner, you know the FPLS approach to any topic. Let us begin with a definition of P.R.I.D.E..… FULL STORY
Acceptable Risk
 | AFRA EDITORIALS By Leonard Henderson |
November 23, 2011
Acceptable Risk
Our good friend Dana Lawhon in Oklahoma says-
A few students are pepper sprayed in the Occupy protest at their College. Now law makers say they need to have an emergency meeting to address the problem about what was done to these students.
Over 50 children die in one state under the watchful eye of DHS/CPS and for some reason the law makers didn’t see any reason for an emergency meeting. I guess they don’t see this as a problem.
Yanno Dana, I think you have stumbled into something. FULL STORY
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
Penn State Sex Scandal Fueling Parental Paranoia
by PAT ANSON on NOVEMBER 22, 2011
American News Report
A national child advocacy organization says the sex scandal at Penn State is fueling parental paranoia, along with phony statistics and over the top warnings about child abuse.
“We don’t need hype that turns every adult into a potential threat,” says Richard Wexler, executive director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. According to Wexler, some news stories falsely claim that “one in four girls and one in six boys” are victim of child sexual abuse, but no scientific study is ever cited to support that claim.
“The scandal surrounding allegations of child abuse by a former Penn State football coach can be a teachable moment,” Wexler said in a news release. ”It can help us address the serious and real problem of child abuse. But not if all we teach is that we should turn in anyone and everyone as a possible child abuser, and not if we teach children to fear all adults.
Former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky faces 40 counts of child sexual abuse against 8 young boys. The scandal led to the firing of football coach Joe Paterno and Penn State’s president. An assistant basketball coach at Syracuse University is also under investigation for the alleged sexual abuse of ball boys.
“At its worst, post Penn State paranoia risks setting off the kind of frenzy of false allegations that led to the mass molestation witch hunts of the 1980s, like the McMartin Preschool,” said Wexler.
A recent survey of registered voters by the Poll Position found there was a high level of concern over the relationship between coaches and young children. 42% of those surveyed said they were very concerned, 33% said somewhat concerned and only 21% said they were not concerned.
Women had the most concern of all. 81% said they were very concerned or somewhat concerned about the relationship between children and their coaches.
Wexler believes many of those fears are overblown. He says studies have shown that about 10% of girls and about 5% of boys were victims of child sexual abuse. “That’s plenty serious enough,” Wexler said. “We don’t need hype that turns every adult into a potential threat.”
http://www.oh-yay.com/penn-state-sex-scandal-fueling-parental-paranoia-8812113.html
We concur with Wexler. Within days of the news, all sorts of legislation was proposed. As if there wasn't already plenty of legislation on the books. The truth is, just like the banks "Too big to fail", there are people "Too important to be held accountable".
American News Report
A national child advocacy organization says the sex scandal at Penn State is fueling parental paranoia, along with phony statistics and over the top warnings about child abuse.
“We don’t need hype that turns every adult into a potential threat,” says Richard Wexler, executive director of the National Coalition for Child Protection Reform. According to Wexler, some news stories falsely claim that “one in four girls and one in six boys” are victim of child sexual abuse, but no scientific study is ever cited to support that claim.
“The scandal surrounding allegations of child abuse by a former Penn State football coach can be a teachable moment,” Wexler said in a news release. ”It can help us address the serious and real problem of child abuse. But not if all we teach is that we should turn in anyone and everyone as a possible child abuser, and not if we teach children to fear all adults.
Former Penn State football coach Jerry Sandusky faces 40 counts of child sexual abuse against 8 young boys. The scandal led to the firing of football coach Joe Paterno and Penn State’s president. An assistant basketball coach at Syracuse University is also under investigation for the alleged sexual abuse of ball boys.
“At its worst, post Penn State paranoia risks setting off the kind of frenzy of false allegations that led to the mass molestation witch hunts of the 1980s, like the McMartin Preschool,” said Wexler.
A recent survey of registered voters by the Poll Position found there was a high level of concern over the relationship between coaches and young children. 42% of those surveyed said they were very concerned, 33% said somewhat concerned and only 21% said they were not concerned.
Women had the most concern of all. 81% said they were very concerned or somewhat concerned about the relationship between children and their coaches.
Wexler believes many of those fears are overblown. He says studies have shown that about 10% of girls and about 5% of boys were victims of child sexual abuse. “That’s plenty serious enough,” Wexler said. “We don’t need hype that turns every adult into a potential threat.”
http://www.oh-yay.com/penn-state-sex-scandal-fueling-parental-paranoia-8812113.html
We concur with Wexler. Within days of the news, all sorts of legislation was proposed. As if there wasn't already plenty of legislation on the books. The truth is, just like the banks "Too big to fail", there are people "Too important to be held accountable".
Antipsychotics Linked to Childhood Diabetes
By Crystal Phend, Senior Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: November 21, 2011
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner
Diabetes may be substantially more likely for children taking second-generation atypical antipsychotics, according to findings from a recent study, which included a number of caveats.
Incidence of diabetes appeared to be more than four times higher among children on a second-generation antipsychotic than in those not using psychotropic medications, Susan E. Andrade, ScD, of the University of Massachusetts in Worcester, and colleagues found.
If real, the risk would pose an important drug safety and public health concern, the group noted in the December issue of Pediatrics. FULL STORY
Published: November 21, 2011
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner
Diabetes may be substantially more likely for children taking second-generation atypical antipsychotics, according to findings from a recent study, which included a number of caveats.
Incidence of diabetes appeared to be more than four times higher among children on a second-generation antipsychotic than in those not using psychotropic medications, Susan E. Andrade, ScD, of the University of Massachusetts in Worcester, and colleagues found.
If real, the risk would pose an important drug safety and public health concern, the group noted in the December issue of Pediatrics. FULL STORY
GAO Study on the Adoption Tax Credit
GAO Study on the Adoption Tax Credit
by SuzanneCWLA | November 22, 2011 at 5:07 PM
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has just released a study on the federal adoption tax credit. From analysis of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) data and documents, observations of IRS examiners, and interviews of IRS officials and other stakeholders, the GAO explored IRS’ communications, processing, and auditing strategy regarding the credit. CWLA and member agencies on our adoption advisory committee were among the stakeholders consulted for this report.
Senator Max Baucus (D-MT) and Representatives Charles Boustany (R-LA) and John Lewis (D-GA) requested the study citing the recent expansion of the credit and to identify possible improvements in advance of the 2012 tax year. The adoption tax credit was first established in 1996. The Affordable Care Act (P.L. 111-148) increased its maximum value from $10,000 to $13,170 and made it refundable for 2010 and 2011. The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-312) made changes to the law by extending the credit through 2012, but as non-refundable and with a reduced maximum to $10,000. In 2013 and following, it will be limited to special needs adoptions and only available for qualified expenses up to a $6,000 value. Since 1996, $4.28 billion in adoption tax credits have been clai med, with $1.2 billion claimed in 2010.
The GAO determined that in 2011 there was diverse communications approaches to tax preparers and adoption advocates, but identified room for improvement in explaining certification requirements. In addition, they found that over two-thirds of almost 100,000 taxpayers claiming the credit were audited by mail, and that four-fifths of those audited had filed the credit accurately and none were fraudulent. These audits caused the IRS to expend unnecessary resources and delayed refunds for families. The study concludes with an outline of approaches to avoid both confusion and ineffective process that led to unnecessary expenditures in low yield tax oversight in 2011.
http://childrensmonitor.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/gao-study-on-the-adoption-tax-credit/
Happy Thanksgiving! Please Pass the Parental Rights
| Sign the Petition | Donate | Volunteer | Learn More | View Online |
November 22, 2011 Happy Thanksgiving! Please Pass the Parental Rights We in the office of ParentalRights.Org want to wish you a happy Thanksgiving, and we want to tell you that we are extremely grateful for you! It is because of your generous donations that we are able to invest our days in working to pass the Parental Rights Amendment, and it is because of your unflagging support that we have great hopes of success! I also need to take a moment to share with you three ways you can help ParentalRights.org this holiday season:
|
| P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 * info@parentalrights.org |
Nancy Pelosi Pushing Government to Institute Hitler Youth
NOVEMBER 22, 2011 AT 6:21 AM
Godfather Politics
....And now House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has announced that she intends to push for national childcare reform, supposedly modeled after Obamacare but is starting to sound more like it is being modeled after Hitler Youth.
Pelosi started by recounting her own experience saying,
“‘I could never get a babysitter — have five kids in six years and no one wants to come to your house. … And everywhere I go, women say the same thing’ about how hard it is to find the kind of reliable care that would make their family lives calmer and work lives more productive.”
Duh! Who in their right mind would want to babysit for Pelosi? I’ve read stories of witches who are more rational and realistic than what I have seen from Pelosi over the past few years.
One political pundit summarized her proposed ObamaChildcare as,
Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/2160/nancy-pelosi-pushing-government-to-institute-hitlers-youth
Godfather Politics
....And now House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has announced that she intends to push for national childcare reform, supposedly modeled after Obamacare but is starting to sound more like it is being modeled after Hitler Youth.
Pelosi started by recounting her own experience saying,
“‘I could never get a babysitter — have five kids in six years and no one wants to come to your house. … And everywhere I go, women say the same thing’ about how hard it is to find the kind of reliable care that would make their family lives calmer and work lives more productive.”
Duh! Who in their right mind would want to babysit for Pelosi? I’ve read stories of witches who are more rational and realistic than what I have seen from Pelosi over the past few years.
One political pundit summarized her proposed ObamaChildcare as,
- “A childcare mandate requiring all parents to buy childcare for their children and enter the workplace
- “A national electronic database of all parents and their parenting habits, ostensibly to determine and enforce the use of “best practices” for raising children
- “Forcing all private-sector child care professionals out of business, creating a single-caregiver government monopoly subjecting impressionable young children to government indoctrination in everything from climate change to illegal immigration and abortion.”
Read more: http://godfatherpolitics.com/2160/nancy-pelosi-pushing-government-to-institute-hitlers-youth
Congressional Deficit Reduction Committee Fails to Reach Deal
by timbricelandbetts | November 22, 2011 at 12:43 PM
Yesterday the Congressional supercommittee was not able to reach a deal and ended their deliberations. The Committee bowed to reality and disbanded. Because the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction couldn't come to an agreement, $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts are on track to begin in 2013, with roughly half coming from the Pentagon.
Many proposals were considered however the two sides were unable to bridge a fundamental divide over taxes and cuts to key safety net programs. Initially House Republicans proposed repealing President Obama's health care law, implementing the controversial House GOP budget drafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), saving $700 billion by block granting Medicaid, cutting $400 billion in mandatory spending, slashing another $1.4 trillion in other health care mandatory spending, saving $150 billion by slicing the federal workforce and putting a $60 billion cap on tort reform. All of which is adamantly opposed by Democrats. Republicans were no more pleased to see what Democrats wanted: the president's $447 billion jobs bill plus well over $1 trillion in new taxes. As talked progressed each side moved away from these initial positions b ut never overcame the critical philosophical differences over taxes and cuts in entitlement programs.
The failure of the super committee will now lead to $1.2 trillion in across-the board cuts, with some programs serving low-income families being protected, including social security, medicaid, and food stamps. Some members of Congress are scrambling to repeal or revise these planned cuts, especially supporters of military spending. Responding to alarms by Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta, Sens. John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) are drafting legislation to prevent cuts in Pentagon spending. Democrats are likely to try to roll back cuts in domestic spending. President Obama says he opposes tampering with the trigger and has issued a veto threat of any legislation to do away with the automatic cuts.
http://childrensmonitor.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/congressional-deficit-reduction-committee-fails-to-reach-deal/
My #1 choice of what to cut would be a FABULOUS cure for LOTS of our TYRANNY problems-
Pelosi Bashes Catholics: “They Have This Conscience Thing”
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 11/21/11 6:43 PM
FULL STORY
I am not Catholic, but alas- I too am weighted down with a "Conscience Thing".
FULL STORY
I am not Catholic, but alas- I too am weighted down with a "Conscience Thing".
Foster Parents; All parents, your rights in jeoprady.
November 21, 2011
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
Occasionally, when receive notice of potential problems we as parents should be made aware of, these situations are of great concern. FULL STORY
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
Occasionally, when receive notice of potential problems we as parents should be made aware of, these situations are of great concern. FULL STORY
Monday, November 21, 2011
Trickle-down tyranny
Trickle-down tyranny - why ordinary people in positions of local power are adopting tactics of tyrants
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) When I read a story yesterday about an 89-year-old woman being water-boarded by nursing home staff over an argument about ice cream, I knew something terrible was amiss across the American landscape. Spontaneous acts of tyranny have been cropping up lately like cancer tumors: a food tyrant in Nevada raids a farm picnic and orders everyone to destroy their food; student protesters in California get pepper-sprayed by thuggish cops who clearly enjoy causing pain and suffering; and now nursing home staffers torture their own resident using techniques borrowed from Guantanamo Bay.
I watched all this with a sense of sadness and disgrace for the human race. And then a realization hit me like a sledgehammer...
People are only following by example
These random acts of tyranny aren't really random acts at all. They are the infantile acting-out of behaviors the childish American public has witnessed being demonstrated by their "leaders." The TSA sexually molesting air travelers isn't just a violation of fundamental human rights -- it's also a demonstration to the mindless masses that this is now "normal" behavior in society, you see.
So as the masses observe Big Government reaching down their own pants, they now get the message that it's okay to sexually molest little boys at sports stadiums, or that it's okay to take children away from parents through C.P.S. and then rape them as part of child relocation "processing" procedures... Must see FULL STORY
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
(NaturalNews) When I read a story yesterday about an 89-year-old woman being water-boarded by nursing home staff over an argument about ice cream, I knew something terrible was amiss across the American landscape. Spontaneous acts of tyranny have been cropping up lately like cancer tumors: a food tyrant in Nevada raids a farm picnic and orders everyone to destroy their food; student protesters in California get pepper-sprayed by thuggish cops who clearly enjoy causing pain and suffering; and now nursing home staffers torture their own resident using techniques borrowed from Guantanamo Bay.
I watched all this with a sense of sadness and disgrace for the human race. And then a realization hit me like a sledgehammer...
People are only following by example
These random acts of tyranny aren't really random acts at all. They are the infantile acting-out of behaviors the childish American public has witnessed being demonstrated by their "leaders." The TSA sexually molesting air travelers isn't just a violation of fundamental human rights -- it's also a demonstration to the mindless masses that this is now "normal" behavior in society, you see.
So as the masses observe Big Government reaching down their own pants, they now get the message that it's okay to sexually molest little boys at sports stadiums, or that it's okay to take children away from parents through C.P.S. and then rape them as part of child relocation "processing" procedures... Must see FULL STORY
Parent Safety Tips
| AFRA EDITORIALS By Leonard Henderson |
November 21, 2011
Parent Safety Tips
Readers invited to ADD WARNING TIPS to this story
Liberty Quotes
"Do you think that we want those laws to be observed? We want them broken. There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power the government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws." -- Ayn Rand (1905-1982) Author Source: Atlas Shrugged, 1957
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Ayn.Rand.Quote.3076
"When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion - when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing - when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors - when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you - when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice - you may know that your society is doomed. -- Ayn Rand (1905-1982) Author Source: Atlas Shrugged, Francisco's "Money Speech"
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Ayn.Rand.Quote.4138
"The difference between a welfare state and a totalitarian state is a matter of time." -- Ayn Rand (1905-1982) Author
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Ayn.Rand.Quote.412E
American Minute
American Minute with Bill Federer
November 21
French author Voltaire was born NOVEMBER 21, 1694.
Yale president Timothy Dwight wrote of Voltaire in his Address "Duty of Americans at the Present Crisis," July 4, 1798, published in Encyclopedia Britannica's Annals of America:
"About the year 1728, Voltaire, so celebrated for his wit and brilliancy and not less distinguished for his hatred of Christianity and his abandonment of principle, formed a systematical design to destroy Christianity and to introduce in its stead a general diffusion of irreligion and atheism...
The principal parts were:...compilation of the Encyclopedia in which the doctrines Christian theology were rendered absurd...Overthrow religious orders...Fabrication of books against Christianity, such as excite doubt."
Timothy Dwight continued:
"Formation of a secret Academy of which Voltaire was the standing president and in which books were formed, altered, forged, imputed as posthumous to deceased writers of reputation."
Bruce Barton, a U.S. Congressman and New York advertising executive, wrote in The Book Nobody Knows, 1926:
"In the 18th century, that vitriolic genius, Voltaire, spoke of the Bible as a short-lived book. He said that within a hundred years it would pass from common use.
Not many people read Voltaire today, but his house has been packed with Bibles as a depot of a Bible society."
American Minute is a registered trademark. Permission granted to reproduce with credit to: www.AmericanMinute.com, PO Box 20163, St. Louis, MO 63123, 314-487-4395, wjfederer@gmail.com
JurisDictionary- How to Argue with Judges!
© 1997-2011 by Jurisdictionary® - All Rights Reserved |
How to Argue with Judges!
( From our "How to Win"Step-by-Step Self-Help Course )
Click ... or Call Toll Free 866-LAW-EASY
(866-529-3279)
Click ... or Call Toll Free 866-LAW-EASY
(866-529-3279)
Arguing with judges is like arguing with baseball umpires.
You better know the rules AND HOW TO USE THEM!
Here are a few rules from the Official MLB Rulebook:
- A player is not permitted to step or go into a dugout to make a catch.
- A player is permitted to reach into a dugout to make a catch.
- If a player makes a catch outside the dugout and his momentum carries him into the dugout, the catch is allowed as long as the player does not fall in the dugout.
Simple enough?
But!
What if the players and the coaches on one team don't know the rules?
What happens then?
Will it do that team any good to argue with the umpire?
Probably not!
And all the %#$@&* will only get you thrown out of the park and possibly grounded for the season!
To argue successfully with a baseball umpire or a judge on his bench in the courtroom, you must know the Rules of Court ... and how how to use them to your advantage!
It's the bottom of the ninth. Two down. Batter at the plate. The count is three and two. The batter pops a high foul. You push back your catcher's mask and dash toward the dugout to make the catch. The ball hits your glove and you trip on the rim of the dugout and fall in. Scrambling to your feet, you climb back out of the dugout, ball in your upraised hand, triumphant grin on your face.
Teammates cheer.
Fans roar fanatic approval from the stands.
But, the scornful look on the umpire's face and his raspy voice erase your victorious joy.
"Foul Ball!"
"But, I caught the ball, ump!"
The player strides purposely toward the umpire, waving a fist, yelling obscenities, and spitting (of course).
Fast behind is the coach, marching menacingly toward the umpire, cap shoved back, fists in the air, also shouting nasties and accusing the umpire of needing a new pair of glasses.
The umpire stands firmly behind the plate, hands planted on his hips, and waits for the verbal onslaught.
"I caught the foul ball. It's an out!"
"It's a foul ball. Period!" the umpire insists.
"You must be blind, Ump! It's an out! Game's over. We win! You saw me catch the ball? Jeeter couldn't do any better!"
"Maybe not," the umpire insists, "but Jeeter knows the ground rules! You fell in the dugout. Catch doesn't count. Get back behind the plate where you belong!"
"But. But. But."
If you studied my affordable 24-hour Jurisdictionary lawsuit self-help course, you know that all the "buts" in the world won't do you a bit of good in court!
Claiming you're pro se and should be allowed to play by different rules won't help, either!
You either learn the rules - and how to use them to your advantage - OR YOU LOSE!
Sending emails to friends after you lose or posting hateful comments on the internet complaining "All our courts are corrupt" just marks you as a loser.
Learn the official rules and how to use them ... or lose!
You can show up in court with all kinds of documents and things that you think are "admissible evidence". You can know the law is on your side.
But!
If you don't know the rules of evidence and rules of procedure - and how to use them to your advantage - you lose!
There will be times when you'll need to argue with the judge about this or that, but do yourself a favor and discover what I learned practicing law in state and federal courts since 1986: unless you know the rules and how to argue the rules effectively, you have no more chance of changing a judge's ruling than the catcher who snags a foul ball in mid-air while falling into the dugout!
The Rules RULE!
End of story!
Losers believe internet fables. Losers get their legal education at the barbershop or on websites or expensive weekend seminars run by people who never practiced law, never went to law school, and don't know mud from sand about the rules of court or how to use them to advantage.
Too many good folks believe mythological silver-bullet easy solutions to their legal problems. As a predictable result, they are losing ... when they could be winning!
A host of wannabe legal gurus infest the internet and barbershops with half-baked schemes that sound too good to be true ... and, like the old adage says, "If it sounds to good to be true, it probably isn't."
You may have heard people claiming you can win by challenging a judge's oath of office, insisting a UCC lien can be used to create collateral for borrowers, insisting banks don't loan "real money", or that you can deny your citizenship and claim to be a "sovereign human being" above the law.
It might work in small claims or traffic court ... but it will not carry the day for you in any kind of serious lawsuit or criminal case.
Hope in one hand and spit in the other. See which hand gets wet.
Learn how to use the rules!
It's not expensive, and people who have my course tell us an 8th grader can learn it all in a single weekend.
If you have a lawyer, you'll save thousands in legal fees by knowing what the lawyer should be doing ... and you'll maximize your chances for success by making certain the lawyer does what should be done, instead of taking you for a ride to the poorhouse - as happens to so many good people these days.
If you don't have a lawyer, you'll know how to stop the opponent's crooked tricks and get the judge on your side!
The key is knowing the rules and how to use them!
To learn more, go to: www.Jurisdictionary.com
| Affordable 24-hour Step-by-Step Self-Help Course Includes: 5-hour video CD simplifies the process of litigation 2 audio CDs present practical tactics and procedures 15 in-depth tutorials on a 4th CD lay out the basics Free EasyGuide to the Rules of Court Instant On-Line Access while CDs are in the Mail Still Only $249 ... plus $7.50 Priority Mail Shipping & Handling Save legal fees! Control judges! Defeat crooked lawyers! www.Jurisdictionary.com Ask anyone who has our course ... "Jurisdictionary Works!" Call Toll Free for details: 866-Law-Easy |
Copyright © 2011 Jurisdictionary® - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED c/o Dr. Frederick D. Graves, JD 621 Howard Creek Lane Stuart, Florida 34994 Toll Free: 866-Law-Easy (866-529-32799 ) |
Foster Parents; Educational Resources #2 -Topics of interest part 3 of 3
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
We stated in part 1 of this listing, of educational resources 2 “you will find a link to many topics of interest to Foster… FULL STORY
We stated in part 1 of this listing, of educational resources 2 “you will find a link to many topics of interest to Foster… FULL STORY
Adoptions in Oklahoma increasing at fastest rate in nation
Oklahoma adopts children at a higher rate than any state in the country.
BY CARRIE COPPERNOLL ccoppernoll@opubco.com
Published: November 20, 2011
http://newsok.com/adoptions-in-oklahoma-increasing-at-fastest-rate-in-nation/article/3625135
I left a nice comment there-
I love numbers and statistics. Especially ones that appear to show "success". Increasing adoptions by 64% over the past 9 years versus a national rate of 3% sounds highly impressive- until you consider WHAT is being called a "success".
Finishing the story with a euphemistic phrase "Forever Families" for some reason reminds me of a similar "success" with rapidly-increasing percentages between 1938 and 1942 of a "Final Solution".
Similarly, "The Swift Adoptions Services unit" aligns with "T4 Aktion (Action) program".
I hope that someday, we can look back at this period of history and recognize the tyranny we endured and the propaganda and spin that hid the truth from the public.
"Permanent termination of parental rights has been described as "the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case." In re Smith (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16, 601 N.E.2d 45, 54. Therefore, parents "must be afforded every procedural and substantive protection the law allows."
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©
BY CARRIE COPPERNOLL ccoppernoll@opubco.com
Published: November 20, 2011
http://newsok.com/adoptions-in-oklahoma-increasing-at-fastest-rate-in-nation/article/3625135
I left a nice comment there-
I love numbers and statistics. Especially ones that appear to show "success". Increasing adoptions by 64% over the past 9 years versus a national rate of 3% sounds highly impressive- until you consider WHAT is being called a "success".
Finishing the story with a euphemistic phrase "Forever Families" for some reason reminds me of a similar "success" with rapidly-increasing percentages between 1938 and 1942 of a "Final Solution".
Similarly, "The Swift Adoptions Services unit" aligns with "T4 Aktion (Action) program".
I hope that someday, we can look back at this period of history and recognize the tyranny we endured and the propaganda and spin that hid the truth from the public.
"Permanent termination of parental rights has been described as "the family law equivalent of the death penalty in a criminal case." In re Smith (1991), 77 Ohio App.3d 1, 16, 601 N.E.2d 45, 54. Therefore, parents "must be afforded every procedural and substantive protection the law allows."
Leonard Henderson, co-founder
American Family Rights
http://familyrights.us
"Until Every Child Comes Home"©
"The Voice of America's Families"©
Sunday, November 20, 2011
American Minute with Bill Federer
American Minute with Bill Federer
November 20
On June 25, 1962, the Supreme Court stopped school prayer.
Ronald Reagan said, March 6, 1984:
"From the early days of the American colonies, prayer in schools was practiced and revered as an important tradition. Indeed, for nearly 2 centuries of our history it was considered a natural expression of our religious freedom.
Then in 1962, the Supreme Court declared school prayer illegal."
Reagan continued:
"Well, I firmly believe the loving God who has blessed our land and made us a good caring people should never have been expelled from America's classrooms."
Senate Majority Leader Robert Byrd, who was born NOVEMBER 20, 1917, agreed, stating:
"In no other place in the United States are there so many...official evidences of...faith in God on the part of Government as there are in Washington...
On the south banks of Washington's Tidal Basin, Jefferson still speaks:
'Can the liberties of a nation be secure when we have removed a conviction that these liberties are the gift of God? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God is just, that his justice cannot sleep forever.'"
Senator Robert Byrd concluded:
"Jefferson's words are a forceful and explicit warning that to remove God from this country will destroy it."
American Minute is a registered trademark. Permission granted to reproduce with credit to: www.AmericanMinute.com, PO Box 20163, St. Louis, MO 63123, 314-487-4395, wjfederer@gmail.com
Saturday, November 19, 2011
The WAR to Destroy America IS Against Families
| AFRA EDITORIALS By Leonard Henderson |
November 19, 2011
The WAR to Destroy America IS Against Families
Child sex-abuse victim exam was unconstitutional: appeals court
I'll be darned. Kids do have Constitutional Rights. Once in a while anyway-
Child sex-abuse victim exam was unconstitutional: appeals court
11/18/2011
NEW YORK, Nov 18 (Reuters) - A family-court order directing a teenage girl to undergo a forensic medical examination for additional proof of sexual abuse violated the girl's constitutional protection against unreasonable search, a New York appeals court has ruled.
In a unanimous opinion published Thursday, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that a family court already had "conclusive evidence of abuse" when it ordered the victim, identified as Shernise C., to submit to a medical exam two years after the alleged assault took place.
Given the evidence, the need for her to submit to a "highly intrusive physical examination is so diminished as to render the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment," wrote Justice Jeffrey Cohen. FULL STORY
The Fourth Amendment actually says- "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
So if kids really had their Constitutional Rights, CPS lying, fabricating crap out of thin air and kidnapping them for the phoniest reasons would be over with.
Child sex-abuse victim exam was unconstitutional: appeals court
11/18/2011
NEW YORK, Nov 18 (Reuters) - A family-court order directing a teenage girl to undergo a forensic medical examination for additional proof of sexual abuse violated the girl's constitutional protection against unreasonable search, a New York appeals court has ruled.
In a unanimous opinion published Thursday, the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that a family court already had "conclusive evidence of abuse" when it ordered the victim, identified as Shernise C., to submit to a medical exam two years after the alleged assault took place.
Given the evidence, the need for her to submit to a "highly intrusive physical examination is so diminished as to render the search unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment," wrote Justice Jeffrey Cohen. FULL STORY
The Fourth Amendment actually says- "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
So if kids really had their Constitutional Rights, CPS lying, fabricating crap out of thin air and kidnapping them for the phoniest reasons would be over with.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Congress Taking Steps to Address Child Abuse and Neglect
Congress Taking Steps to Address Child Abuse and Neglect
BY YaMinco | November 18, 2011 at 3:26 PM
In light of alleged child sexual abuses on college campuses across the country, members of Congress have taken steps to address the need to improve the safety and well-being of all children by introducing legislation and calling for hearings with the intent of improving child abuse reporting laws. Federal law does not identify categories of mandatory reporters of abuse or neglect or direct state identified mandated reporters to any specific person or agency. Furthermore, less than 20 states require that any person who witnesses child abuse report it, while the majority of states only require certain professionals report abuse.
As a result, Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) introduced legislation to require all adults to report child abuse and neglect to the appropriate authorities. The Speak Up to Protect Every Abused Kid Act of 2011, S. 1877, would require all states to pass and enforce a law requiring all adults to report instances of known or suspected child abuse. Any state receiving funding through the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), the federal statute focused on child abuse and neglect prevention and response, would be required to enforce these reporting requirements. The Speak Up Act will also provides a baseline definition of abuse or neglect, support to states to carry out educational campaigns and training to inform individuals about what constitutes child abuse and neglect, and funding for tes ting innovative approaches that may improve the reporting of incidents of child abuse and neglect. Finally, it requires a report to Congress assessing the implementation of the amendments made by the Speak Up Act, as well as an update on States efforts to improve reporting on and responding to reports of child abuse or neglect.
Senator Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) introduced a similar bill, the Child Abuse Reporting Enforcement (CARE) Act, S. 1879, which would require states to mandate the reporting of child abuse to law enforcement and child protective services in order to receive federal social services funding. Unlike the Step Up Act, the CARE Act would make it a felony, with a penalty of at least one year in prison, for any individual who fails to report such abuse. In order to create consistency among state child abuse reporting laws, this bill would specify that all witnesses report abuse to the law enforcement authorities and child protective services.
In the House, Representative George Miller (D-CA), the senior Democrat on the House Education and the Workforce Committee, asked Chairman John Kline (R-MN) to call a hearing to examine whether federal laws specifically designed to protect children and students require changes. In his letter to the Chairman, Miller cited two federal laws that are intended to protect children from abuse and require the reporting of criminal activity when such cases are discovered. In addition to the CAPTA Act mentioned above, the Clery Act requires higher educational institutions to collect and report on crimes that occur on campus.
CWLA supports Congress’ efforts to raise awareness regarding the reporting of child abuse and neglect and will continue to monitor their efforts.
http://childrensmonitor.wordpress.com/2011/11/18/congress-taking-steps-to-address-child-abuse-and-neglect/
What a complete Circle Jerk by the Commies in Congress
Child abuse or failure of the system?
Ali Meyer Reporting
KFOR-TV
November 17, 2011
...."You would be insane. You would have to be on acid or some sort of narcotics to be a foster parent in the State of Oklahoma." -- Attorney Scott Adams
FULL STORY- http://www.kfor.com/news/local/kfor-child-abuse-or-failure-of-the-system-20111117,0,2658243,full.story
Or anywhere else, for that matter.
KFOR-TV
November 17, 2011
...."You would be insane. You would have to be on acid or some sort of narcotics to be a foster parent in the State of Oklahoma." -- Attorney Scott Adams
FULL STORY- http://www.kfor.com/news/local/kfor-child-abuse-or-failure-of-the-system-20111117,0,2658243,full.story
Or anywhere else, for that matter.
Thursday, November 17, 2011
One in four American women take medication for a mental disorder
One in four American women take medication for a mental disorder
Last updated at 1:59 PM on 17th November 2011
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062634/One-American-women-medication-mental-disorder.html
Does it seem to you like this has been run into the ground yet?
- Women more likely than men to take antipsychotic drugs, according to new report
- Most often prescribed to females over 45
- Prescriptions for psychiatric problems in all adults have risen 22% since 2001
- Usage has quadrupled among men aged between 20 and 64 over the last decade
Last updated at 1:59 PM on 17th November 2011
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2062634/One-American-women-medication-mental-disorder.html
Does it seem to you like this has been run into the ground yet?
Liberty Quotes
"I believe that if the people of this nation fully understood what Congress has done to them over the last 49 years, they would move on Washington; they would not wait for an election... It adds up to a preconceived plan to destroy the economic and social independence of the United States!" -- George W. Malone (1890-1961) U.S. Senator (Nevada) 1957 Source: speaking before Congress
http://quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/George.Malone.Quote.BD0A
NOTE- That was 55 years ago. Americans have been so Dumbed Down by Public Education that about 50% of the population thinks things are just fine.
Occupiers are the Result of Our Socialistic Education System
Written on NOVEMBER 17, 2011 by GIACOMO
Occupiers are the Result of Our Socialistic Education System
Godfather Politics
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2073/occupiers-are-the-result-of-our-socialistic-education-system/
I left a nice comment there-
The 100% publik skool edukaytud. See what the Communist Manifesto of 1848 says about it-
Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not intended the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.
http://revolution2.us/content/docs/history/communist/manifesto.htm#family
Occupiers are the Result of Our Socialistic Education System
Godfather Politics
http://godfatherpolitics.com/2073/occupiers-are-the-result-of-our-socialistic-education-system/
I left a nice comment there-
The 100% publik skool edukaytud. See what the Communist Manifesto of 1848 says about it-
Abolition of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based? On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its complement in the practical absence of the family among proletarians, and in public prostitution.
The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.
But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.
And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or indirect, of society, by means of schools, etc.? The Communists have not intended the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the influence of the ruling class.
The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.
http://revolution2.us/content/docs/history/communist/manifesto.htm#family
Every Child Deserves a Family Act Briefing
Every Child Deserves a Family Act Briefing
by SuzanneCWLA | November 17, 2011 at 5:16 PM
The Every Child Deserves a Family Act (S. 1770) was the topic of a Congressional briefing today organized by Senator Kirsten Gillibrand’s (D-NY) office. Advocates from LGBT and Adoption organizations engaged in a panel discussion about the bill and its promise of expanding the number of eligible families for children awaiting adoption. Jonathan Gilead and Michele Jawando of Gillibrand’s staff started off the discussion talking about the Senator’s strong support of the bill .
Then, Emily Hecht of the Family Equality Council explained precedence for and the logistics of nondiscrimination policies. She described the ease of implementing S. 1770 by pointing to the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) existing support and technical assistance regarding LGBT nondiscrimination in adoptions. Rhodes Perry of Parents, Family and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG) agreed that Every Child Deserves a Family is good policy and described how it will produce savings by shifting children in care to permanent families. Ellen Kahn with the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) talked about her organization’s direct work with public child welfare agencies and how passing the bill would lift barriers to accessing certain training funds in addition to preventing case-halting discrimination by individuals work ing in adoptions. Nicole Dobbins of Voice for Adoption (VFA) described the youth waiting for adoption: that they tend to be older, have special needs, have been in several foster care placements, and are often in sibling groups. She attested to their strong desire for a permanent family without concern of the family’s make up.
Voice for Adoption holds an annual Adoptive Family Portrait Project engaging Congressional members in celebrating November as National Adoption Month. This year over 60 Senators and Representatives participated by posting a picture of an adoptive family from their constituency. The portraits depict a diverse group of adoptive families, including those headed by LGBT parents. The last panelist of the briefing was Mathew Reynell whose family portrait is posted in Senator Gillibrand’s office. Mr. Reynell and his partner adopted their son James from foster care just a couple of years ago. Mr. Reynell described the adoption process and how much positive socio-emotional and educational progress James has made since joining their family. He credits the love of a forever family as the best medicine for struggling children.
SuzanneCWLA | November 17, 2011 at 5:16 PM
http://childrensmonitor.wordpress.com/2011/11/17/every-child-deserves-a-family-act-briefing/
How evil can it get before it finally crashes? For some reason, I am reminded of this cartoon-
Overruled Movie
The doctor... The principal... The judge...
YOU are the parent. So why do THEY make all of the decisions? | ||
See the gripping 35-minute online docudrama that reveals real dangers to your own family. See why we must act and how you can help. | ||
| Visit OverruledMovie.com |
Foster Parents; Educational Resources #2 -Topics of interest part 2 of 3
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
We stated in part 1 of this listing, of educational resources 2 “you will find a link to many topics of interest to Foster… FULL STORY
We stated in part 1 of this listing, of educational resources 2 “you will find a link to many topics of interest to Foster… FULL STORY
Foster Parents; Now what? “Standing” getting ready for court. Ch 8- 10/11
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
In this series, we are taking a closer look at the guide to Pro Se, the book is called Standing in the… FULL STORY
In this series, we are taking a closer look at the guide to Pro Se, the book is called Standing in the… FULL STORY
Foster Parents; Now what? “Standing” getting ready for court. Ch.7- 9/11
Marilyn Harrison, Foster Families Examiner
In this series, we are taking a closer look at the guide to Pro Se, the book is called Standing in the… FULL STORY
In this series, we are taking a closer look at the guide to Pro Se, the book is called Standing in the… FULL STORY
Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights
Overruled: Government Invasion of your Parental Rights (Official Movie)
Tuesday February 3, 2009
United Nations Population Fund Leader Says Family Breakdown is a Triumph for Human Rights
NOTE what the Communist Manifesto has to say on the subject. Same thing?
Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right"
October 16, 2009
Family Rights Examiner Leonard Henderson
....On February 16, 1995, Madeleine Albright, at the time the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child, against massive protest by American families.
The United States has not ratified the CRC. (We never want it to be ratified. See the Parental Rights Amendment
Lots more info at http://familyrights.us/UNCRC)
But the "Best Interest of the Child" concept under Parens patriae was fully implemented in the United States beginning with CAPTA '74.
So the truth is, the Convention on the Rights of the Child has been supplanted into law and already DE FACTO in force.
There is likely no phrase in our language more dangerous to children than "the best interests of the child", because it's the banner enabling the unconstitutional government officious and tyrannical intrusion into families. FULL STORY
NEW! S. Res. 99
STOP RATIFICATION OF THE CRC
STOP RATIFICATION OF THE CRC
Tuesday February 3, 2009
United Nations Population Fund Leader Says Family Breakdown is a Triumph for Human Rights
NOTE what the Communist Manifesto has to say on the subject. Same thing?
Best interest of the child- A new "Civil Right"
October 16, 2009
Family Rights Examiner Leonard Henderson
....On February 16, 1995, Madeleine Albright, at the time the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations, signed the Convention on the Rights of the Child, against massive protest by American families.
The United States has not ratified the CRC. (We never want it to be ratified. See the Parental Rights Amendment
Lots more info at http://familyrights.us/UNCRC)
But the "Best Interest of the Child" concept under Parens patriae was fully implemented in the United States beginning with CAPTA '74.
So the truth is, the Convention on the Rights of the Child has been supplanted into law and already DE FACTO in force.
There is likely no phrase in our language more dangerous to children than "the best interests of the child", because it's the banner enabling the unconstitutional government officious and tyrannical intrusion into families. FULL STORY
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
Victory–In Face of Opposition, Leahy Scraps VAWA Draft Provision Which Lowers Evidence Standards
Victory–In Face of Opposition, Leahy Scraps VAWA Draft Provision Which Lowers Evidence Standards
November 16, 2011
Victory–In Face of Opposition, Leahy Scraps VAWA Draft Provision Which Lowers Evidence Standards
False allegations of abuse are common in family court, and have been used to separate many fathers (and some mothers) from their children. The reasons for this problem are many, but one of the biggest is the low evidence standard for upholding abuse claims.
The common evidence standard for domestic violence restraining orders is “preponderance of the evidence,” often conceptualized as a mere 51/49% likelihood of guilt. By contrast, when someone seeks a regular civil restraining order, the more stringent and appropriate “clear and convincing” evidence standard is usually used.
In practice, this means that when neighbors Bob and Jim have a dispute over Bob’s dog eating Jim’s flowers, and Jim allegedly threatens to throw rocks at Bob’s dog, the courts demand that Bob provide solid evidence to support his claims of Jim’s threats. By stark contrast, if Bob’s wife decides to divorce him and seeks to throw him out of his house on a restraining order and cut him off from his kids, she has a much lower burden of proof on her claims.
Fathers and Families wants abused women (and men) to be afforded the protection they need. However, we have relentlessly publicized and fought the common problem of false allegations being used as child custody and financial maneuvers in divorce. And one of the key components in this fight is to replace the “preponderance” standard with the “clear and convincing” standard.
VAWA Re-Authorization Sought to Lower Evidence Standards
Recently there have been moves by the Obama administration to lower the evidence standard that universities and colleges use to adjudicate accusations of violence or abuse. According to Hans Bader, Esq.:
Historically, most colleges used a “clear and convincing” evidence standard in student and faculty discipline cases…this due process safeguard has come under attack, most prominently [by]…the head of the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, Russlyn Ali, who has demanded that colleges dilute the presumption of innocence in sexual harassment and assault cases by instead using a “preponderance of the evidence” standard…
Now, the Senate draft bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act [by Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT)] has inexplicably sought to expand the assault on due process. The draft VAWA bill would give OCR the power to set the “standard of proof” not only in harassment and rape cases, but also in other kinds of cases like “domestic violence,” “stalking,” and inappropriate behavior in dating relationships.
A Firestorm of Protest
Colleges and universities have often victimized innocent male students by validating spurious abuse or assault charges, as Fathers and Families Board Member Robert Franklin, Esq. details here. Franklin explains:
The new standard has been met with a firestorm of protest. The American Association of University Professors, the National Association of Scholars and the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education all came out against the measure. Nationwide, some 30 editorials did as well.
As it stands, all colleges and universities must now use the lower standard or face the loss of federal funding. But what’s been done by bureaucratic fiat can be undone in the same way.
But Leahy’s proposed bill to reauthorize the Violence Against Women Act would have made the lower standard a requirement of federal law, and, had it passed, it would have taken another act of Congress to undo.
The good news is that Leahy has now scrapped these provisions in his VAWA draft in the face of these protests. We thank and congratulate all who were involved in opposing this harmful provision. To learn more, see Franklin’s post here and Bader’s article here.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)