Saturday, March 1, 2014

Colorado¹s Wild West "roll your own" election rules

Colorado¹s Wild West "roll your own" election rules

Reposted with permission of the author

Reliable enough for Afghanistan, too reliable for Colorado.

February 26, 2014‹Colorado is now the owner of an election system that would make the tin pot dictator of any banana republic proud. The country that found a simple method to insure voting integrity in the 2010 Iraqi elections now has a state with no controls at all. It¹s the Wild West for elections in Colorado.

   Desperate to maintain their hold on power after two of their senators were recalled and another forced to resign, radical Democrats in the Colorado legislature rushed through another election bill on the heels of last year¹s disaster called House Bill 1303. That one contained such provisions as mandatory all mail-in ballots, same day voter registration and reduced residency requirements for any state-wide election to twenty-two days. Voter ID was not included and the local polling place is a thing of the past.

   The law raised havoc with local elections. Among a host of issues was the fact that residency requirements were up to 30 days in some jurisdictions‹now longer than state wide. The hastily-written law was so bad that some had called for its repeal‹or at least a two-year delay in implementation.

   Given the chance this session to fix the mistakes of the massive 1303 law, Democrats chose‹not surprisingly, perhaps‹to double down on their election free-for-all strategy. This year¹s bill, House Bill 1164, was rushed through just like last year¹s bill on straight party line votes.

Governor Hickenlooper couldn¹t sign it into law fast enough.

   The new law impacts 1,900 local taxing authorities across Colorado, including fire districts, recreation districts, school districts, and sanitation districts. It exempts these elections from all Colorado election rules because the proponents of HB 1164 - local boards and town councils - demanded no regulatory oversight of their elections.

   Election integrity activist Marilyn Marks called this approach ³roll your own² election rules. She points out that any Colorado voter may now show up in any local election on the same day he ³moves² into town. It becomes easy to manipulate local elections with a few ³new voters.²
   Since 1992, voters have decided tax and debt issues on the November coordinated ballot. Last November, dozens of tax initiatives were defeated at the polls, including Democrat and union-sponsored Amendment 66, a multi-billion tax gift to unions. Coordinated elections may also become a thing of the past, voters getting multiple ballots at pretty much any time the local taxing authority chooses.

   Senate Republicans tried to impact the bill but to no avail. Amendments to include Secretary of State oversight; a written set of procedures; ADA-compliant and accessible polling locations and voting equipment; a local place to vote; and a host of other long-standing voter rights and security controls were all defeated.

   Democrats also ignored citizens who didn¹t want mandatory mail-in ballots. When the idea of all mail-in ballots was last put to the people, it was rejected. This will come as a shock to many come November.

Silly citizens: elections are for the government.

It doesn¹t matter who votes, it matters who counts the votes.

Josef Stalin, 1923

   Authorities holding elections now set their own rules, count the ballots themselves without oversight and announce the results whenever they¹re ready. If they want to send the ballots to a tabulating company in Nevada, no problem. Think electronic machines can¹t be rigged? Think again. Numerous reports from the 2010 election claim that electors pushed the button for one candidate and the result showed another.

   Nor does fraud need to be ³massive.² A few percentage points may be all it takes‹and small enough to not even raise eyebrows. A busload of ³new residents² in a local election, ballots harvested from waste bins or sent to phantom voters could easily tip the balance.

   Democrats can¹t take all the blame, prominent as they have been in dismantling free and fair elections in Colorado. The County Clerk and Recorder¹s Association has been complicit, both Democrats and Republicans. It is an open secret that the association is in the pocket of large makers of voting systems but no investigative reporter has ever undertaken to look into it. El Paso County Clerk and Recorder Wayne Williams, often the lone opposition among country clerks, resigned from the group.

   Last session Colorado Democrats tried to take away Coloradan¹s gun rights. This year they put a nail in the coffin of voting rights.

   ³You people in Colorado, if you keep electing these pinheads this is what you¹re going to get² said Bill O¹Reilly. He¹s right.

About the author

   Al Maurer is a political scientist and founder of The Voice of Liberty. He writes on topics of limited government and individual rights.



NOTE: If you would like to be removed from our mailing list please respond to this message with REMOVE in the subject line. Comments or criticisms of our policies or Web sites should be addressed to

     You are receiving this message because (1) you asked to be added to our mailing list; (2) you sent the EJF an e-mail or requested help from us; (3) you are known to work on issues related to human rights; (4) you are known to be interested in civil liberties and equal justice; (5) your name and address appeared as an addressee on email sent to us; (6) you are a member of or contribute to the Equal Justice Foundation, or (7) you are on a distribution list that forwards EJF newsletters.

      Most prior EJF newsletters are archived at after a few days.

                      Issues of interest to the Equal Justice Foundation are:


Courts and Civil Liberties

Domestic Violence      

     Domestic Violence Against Men in Colorado

     Emerson case                                             

Families and Marriage               

Prohibitions and the War On Drugs

Vote Fraud and Election Issues 

   The Equal Justice Foundation (EJF) is a non-profit 501(c)(3) public charity supported entirely by members and contributions. Dues are $25 per year and you may join at or by printing and mailing in the application at Contributions are tax deductible and can be made on the web at or by sending a check to the address below.

Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A.

President, Equal Justice Foundation


455 Bear Creek Road

Colorado Springs, Colorado 80906-5820

The good men may do separately is small compared with what they may do collectively.

Benjamin Franklin


No comments:

Post a Comment