Friday, January 24, 2014

Debate Over Unexplained Fractures Flares Anew

Child Abuse Defense News by David S. Marshall
January 24, 2014 

New developments in law, medicine, and psychology affecting child abuse cases. For additional news and information, visit

Debate Over Unexplained Fractures Flares Anew

Several physicians have published in Pediatric Imaging (January 2014) "A Critical Review of the Classic Metaphyseal Lesion: Traumatic or Metabolic?" The article attacks the common belief among American physicians that certain kinds of apparent bone fractures in infants—called classic metaphyseal lesions, bucket-handle fractures, and corner fractures—occur almost exclusively as a result of physical child abuse.

The authors (David Ayoub, Charles Hyman, Marta Cohen, and Marvin Miller) find the evidence supporting this belief scant. They also say microscopic studies and x-rays of CMLs look similar to those of healing infantile rickets. They thus contend many injuries that most physicians would say show child abuse may instead show the child has had rickets or another metabolic disease. They "conclude that classic metaphyseal lesions are not true fractures."
A commentary piece in the same issue of the same publication severely criticizes the article. It asserts that solid science shows CMLs to be products of child abuse.
Child Abuse Defense News is a publication of For additional information, contact David S. Marshall by phone at (206) 826-1400 or email at

Know of someone who may be interested in receiving this newsletter? If so, feel free to pass it along!
For additional information on removing yourself from this list or updating your email address, call (206) 920-3280 or send an email to

Forward email
Child Abuse Law Enews | 1001 Fourth Avenue, 44th Floor | Seattle | WA | 98154

No comments:

Post a Comment